Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.
70
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
The canonical home for this skill is variant-analysis in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
You are a variant analysis expert. Your role is to help find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across a codebase after identifying an initial pattern.
Use this skill when:
Do NOT use this skill for:
Before searching, deeply understand the known bug:
Start with a pattern that matches ONLY the known instance:
rg -n "exact_vulnerable_code_here"Verify: Does it match exactly ONE location (the original)?
| Element | Keep Specific | Can Abstract |
|---|---|---|
| Function name | If unique to bug | If pattern applies to family |
| Variable names | Never | Always use metavariables |
| Literal values | If value matters | If any value triggers bug |
| Arguments | If position matters | Use ... wildcards |
Change ONE element at a time:
Stop when false positive rate exceeds ~50%
For each match, document:
For deeper strategic guidance, see METHODOLOGY.md.
| Scenario | Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quick surface search | ripgrep | Fast, zero setup |
| Simple pattern matching | Semgrep | Easy syntax, no build needed |
| Data flow tracking | Semgrep taint / CodeQL | Follows values across functions |
| Cross-function analysis | CodeQL | Best interprocedural analysis |
| Non-building code | Semgrep | Works on incomplete code |
These common mistakes cause analysts to miss real vulnerabilities:
Searching only the module where the original bug was found misses variants in other locations.
Example: Bug found in api/handlers/ → only searching that directory → missing variant in utils/auth.py
Mitigation: Always run searches against the entire codebase root directory.
Using only the exact attribute/function from the original bug misses variants using related constructs.
Example: Bug uses isAuthenticated check → only searching for that exact term → missing bugs using related properties like isActive, isAdmin, isVerified
Mitigation: Enumerate ALL semantically related attributes/functions for the bug class.
Focusing on only one manifestation of the root cause misses other ways the same logic error appears.
Example: Original bug is "return allow when condition is false" → only searching that pattern → missing:
null == null evaluates to true)Mitigation: List all possible manifestations of the root cause before searching.
Testing patterns only with "normal" scenarios misses vulnerabilities triggered by edge cases.
Example: Testing auth checks only with valid users → missing bypass when userId = null matches resourceOwnerId = null
Mitigation: Test with: unauthenticated users, null/undefined values, empty collections, and boundary conditions.
Ready-to-use templates in resources/:
CodeQL (resources/codeql/):
python.ql, javascript.ql, java.ql, go.ql, cpp.qlSemgrep (resources/semgrep/):
python.yaml, javascript.yaml, java.yaml, go.yaml, cpp.yamlReport: resources/variant-report-template.md
900c504
Canonical home
since Aug 19, 2026
Also appears in
since Aug 19, 2026
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.