CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

vector-database-engineer

Expert in vector databases, embedding strategies, and semantic search implementation. Masters Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, and pgvector for RAG applications, recommendation systems, and similar

56

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/vector-database-engineer/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is vector-database-engineer in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is concise and logically organized with a clear workflow, but it stays at a high advisory level without concrete executable guidance or validation checkpoints, and its one external reference points to a file that is not present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Add concrete, actionable detail to key steps — example index configurations, sample CLI/API commands, or parameter values — so Claude can act rather than just plan.

Insert explicit validation checkpoints into the workflow (e.g. verify recall vs. latency after tuning, re-validate after reindexing) to support database/batch operations.

Create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' or remove the dangling reference so progressive disclosure resolves to a real file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with short bulleted sections and no padding about what vector databases are, though generic filler lines like 'Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes' and 'The task is unrelated to vector database engineer' could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Steps are largely abstract ('Select appropriate embedding model', 'Configure metadata schema') with only a few concrete specifics (index names 'HNSW, IVF, PQ' and dimension range '384-1536'), lacking executable code, commands, or concrete configuration values needed to act precisely.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

An 8-step workflow is clearly sequenced, but it has no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops despite involving database/index operations at scale, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned and points one level deep to 'resources/implementation-playbook.md', but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle, leaving the single progressive-disclosure pointer broken.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly communicates a distinct vector-database niche with good keyword coverage and concrete tool names, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps its completeness and keeps the trigger guidance weakly implied rather than explicit.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete trigger situations, e.g. 'Use when building RAG, semantic search, or similarity-search systems over vector embeddings.'

Include natural synonyms such as 'similarity search' and 'nearest neighbor search' to improve trigger-term coverage.

Reframe 'Expert in'/'Masters' phrasing into concrete actions (e.g. 'select, index, and tune vector databases') to lift specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete tools and application areas ('Masters Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, and pgvector for RAG applications, recommendation systems'), though it describes expertise rather than enumerating concrete actions, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' the skill does, but the 'when' is only weakly implied via the use-case list and there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural user terms ('vector databases', 'embedding', 'semantic search', 'RAG', 'recommendation systems'), but misses common synonyms like 'similarity search' or 'nearest neighbor search' in the description itself.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche centered on vector databases with distinct, named-engine triggers gives minimal conflict risk with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.