Content
40%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized but largely descriptive reference of VR/AR principles, strong on structure but weak on executable guidance and workflow sequencing. It reads as general domain knowledge rather than skill-specific, actionable instruction.
Suggestions
Add concrete, actionable steps or code for the key directives — e.g., a frame-budget snippet, a locomotion/teleport implementation pattern, or a Unity/Unreal checklist command — so the guidance is executable rather than descriptive.
Replace the generic 'When to Use' boilerplate with explicit, specific triggers and a short workflow for the most common task (e.g., a comfort/performance review sequence with a validation checkpoint).
Trim or move widely-known reference material (depth cues, motion-sickness causes) to keep only what is non-obvious or skill-specific, and consider splitting the detailed platform/performance tables into a references file for cleaner progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body uses lean tables and bullets with no padded prose, but much of the substance (depth cues, motion-sickness causes, snap turning) is general VR knowledge Claude already has, fitting 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; it is above 2 because the format is genuinely compact, and below 4 because several sections restate known concepts rather than earning every token. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The content states high-level directives ('Maintain 90 FPS', 'Avoid camera shake', 'Large, readable text') and useful numeric specs but provides no commands, code, or concrete implementation steps, matching 'Minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute'; it is not a 3 because it describes targets rather than giving actionable how-to guidance. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized into topical sections (1-6) but presents no sequenced process or workflow, and the 'When to Use' section is generic boilerplate ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview'), fitting 'Rough sequence present but many gaps; steps poorly defined'; it is above 1 because the sections are coherently organized, and below 3 because there is no actual workflow to follow. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with no bundle files present, organized into six clearly headed numbered sections with tables and no nested references, matching 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear'; it is not a 5 because at ~120 lines some detailed platform/performance tables could be split into reference files, and not a 3 because the organization is clean and navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |