Content
50%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a reasonable high-level framework for WCAG auditing but lacks the concrete, executable guidance needed to be truly actionable. The workflow is logically sequenced but missing explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops. The content delegates heavily to a referenced playbook that doesn't appear to exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add concrete examples: specific axe-core commands, sample audit output format, and at least one remediation code snippet (e.g., fixing a missing alt attribute or ARIA label).
Include explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow, such as 'Verify zero critical violations in axe scan before proceeding' and a feedback loop for failed re-tests.
Provide the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` file or inline key checklists/templates so the skill is self-contained enough to be useful.
Add a concrete example mapping an issue to a WCAG criterion with severity and remediation (e.g., 'Missing alt text → WCAG 1.1.1 → Critical → Add descriptive alt attribute').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with minimal unnecessary explanation. The 'Use this skill when' and 'Do not use this skill when' sections add some bulk but are reasonable for scoping. Minor verbosity in repeating the resource reference. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The instructions are high-level steps without concrete commands, code examples, or specific techniques. 'Run automated scans' and 'Perform manual checks' lack the specifics needed to execute—no example axe commands, no sample audit output format, no concrete remediation code. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in a logical sequence with a re-test step (step 4), but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit. There's no feedback loop for what to do if re-testing fails, and no concrete validation criteria or commands. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed content, which is appropriate progressive disclosure. However, the bundle file doesn't exist (no bundle provided), the reference is repeated twice, and there's no indication of what's actually in that file or other sub-references for different topics. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |