CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wiki-qa

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/wiki-qa/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is wiki-qa in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, well-structured instruction skill with concrete response-format guidance and a clear procedure. The main flaw is a redundant trailing 'When to Use' section and a repeated opening tagline that add noise without value.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicate trailing '## When to Use' section and its generic filler line; the leading 'When to Use' already covers triggers.

Drop the repeated opening tagline under '# Wiki Q&A' since it duplicates the frontmatter description.

Tighten the procedure steps with concrete signals (e.g., which search tools/patterns to use for locating relevant files).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the opening tagline repeats the description and a second '## When to Use' section ending in generic filler ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow...') is trimmable redundancy.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete response guidance is given (citation format `(src/path/file.ts:42)`, required headings, 'Key Files' table), while the procedure steps ('Search the codebase', 'Read those files') remain somewhat high-level with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-step sequence is present with a conditional feedback branch ('If information is insufficient, say so and suggest files to examine'); this read-only skill needs no destructive-operation validation, so the minor checkpoint gaps are acceptable.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the well-organized ## sections support a high score, but the duplicated '## When to Use' section is a minor organization gap that keeps it just below 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly answers both what the skill does and when to trigger it, using natural user phrasings. Its only weakness is a narrow action set that limits specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('repository questions') and one concrete action ('Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence'), but offers only a single action rather than a comprehensive list of capabilities.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what it does ('Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence') and when to use it with concrete trigger phrases, explicitly answering both what and when.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ('how does X work', 'where is Y defined', 'understand a specific file, function, or component'), giving good keyword coverage with only minor variations missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'grounded entirely in source code evidence' framing carves a clear Q&A niche with distinct triggers, with only minor overlap risk against general code-search or exploration skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.