Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured instruction skill with concrete response-format guidance and a clear procedure. The main flaw is a redundant trailing 'When to Use' section and a repeated opening tagline that add noise without value.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate trailing '## When to Use' section and its generic filler line; the leading 'When to Use' already covers triggers.
Drop the repeated opening tagline under '# Wiki Q&A' since it duplicates the frontmatter description.
Tighten the procedure steps with concrete signals (e.g., which search tools/patterns to use for locating relevant files).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the opening tagline repeats the description and a second '## When to Use' section ending in generic filler ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow...') is trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete response guidance is given (citation format `(src/path/file.ts:42)`, required headings, 'Key Files' table), while the procedure steps ('Search the codebase', 'Read those files') remain somewhat high-level with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is present with a conditional feedback branch ('If information is insufficient, say so and suggest files to examine'); this read-only skill needs no destructive-operation validation, so the minor checkpoint gaps are acceptable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the well-organized ## sections support a high score, but the duplicated '## When to Use' section is a minor organization gap that keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |