Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable planning skill with concrete templates and an explicit TDD validation loop. It is slightly held back by minor padding and a weak closing When-to-Use section, and gains nothing from progressive disclosure since no bundle files accompany it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete templates, but includes minor padding: 'questionable taste', a duplicated assumption sentence, and a low-value 'When to Use' section ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready templates (plan header, task structure with pytest/git commands and expected output) and exact path/commit patterns; minor gaps are the placeholder fields ([Feature Name], [Component Name]) and reliance on the spec for actual content. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The TDD task loop has explicit validation checkpoints ('Expected: FAIL' then 'Expected: PASS' before commit) and the plan-then-handoff sequence is clear; the top-level plan-writing workflow itself lacks an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Overview, Granularity, Header, Task Structure, Remember, Execution Handoff) and points to sub-skills via explicit 'REQUIRED SUB-SKILL' markers; minor organization gaps (e.g. the filler When-to-Use section) keep it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |