CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

zoom-automation

Automate Zoom meeting creation, management, recordings, webinars, and participant tracking via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

59

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/zoom-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is zoom-automation in administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured, concrete, and actionable for an MCP-orchestration skill, but destructive delete workflows lack explicit pre-deletion verification and several pitfalls are redundantly repeated across sections.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification checkpoint before permanent recording deletion, e.g. 'Confirm the meetingId and that action is intentionally "delete" (irreversible) before calling ZOOM_DELETE_MEETING_RECORDINGS; prefer "trash" unless permanent deletion is confirmed.'

De-duplicate pitfalls (UUID double-encoding, pagination, rate limits) by stating them once in Common Patterns / Known Pitfalls and cross-referencing from workflow sections.

Provide at least one complete example parameter payload for ZOOM_CREATE_A_MEETING to make the most common workflow fully copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is Zoom' padding) and earns its tokens with concrete params and pitfalls, but pitfalls like UUID double-encoding, pagination, and rate limits are repeated across workflow sections and the Known Pitfalls/Common Patterns sections and could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete tool slugs, exact parameter values (type codes 1/2/3/8, ISO 8601 formats, 'trash'/'delete' actions) and a Quick Reference table mapping tasks to tools and params; the only minor gap is the absence of full example request payloads.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Workflows are clearly numbered with [Required]/[Optional]/[Prerequisite] tags and setup includes validation ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE'), but destructive operations like permanent ZOOM_DELETE_MEETING_RECORDINGS ('delete' action) lack a pre-deletion verification checkpoint, invoking the destructive/batch cap at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the skill is a single well-organized self-contained file with clear section headers and a Quick Reference navigation table, though some inline per-workflow pitfalls could be consolidated to reduce redundancy.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a specific Zoom-automation niche with strong natural trigger terms and high distinctiveness, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which caps its completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to schedule Zoom meetings, manage webinars, retrieve cloud recordings, or track meeting participants.'

Replace the generic 'management' with a concrete verb (e.g., 'update and reschedule meetings') to lift specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

Drop or relocate 'Always search tools first for current schemas' out of the description since it is an execution instruction rather than a capability or trigger.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete Zoom capabilities ('meeting creation, management, recordings, webinars, and participant tracking') but 'management' is generic filler, leaving minor coverage gaps rather than fully comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance ('Always search tools first' is an instruction, not a trigger), capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user terms like 'Zoom meeting', 'recordings', 'webinars', and 'participant tracking' plus provider names ('Rube MCP', 'Composio'), giving good keyword coverage with a few common variants missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Zoom' with 'via Rube MCP (Composio)' carves a clear, distinct niche with specific triggers and minimal risk of conflicting with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.