Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, largely actionable process skill: a 6-step sequenced workflow with explicit decision criteria, a concrete evidence-gathering command set, a worked evidence-table format, and a genuine verification step with a reporting checklist. It is held back from top marks by minor redundancy across sections, the absence of an explicit validate→fix→retry recovery loop in verification, and a couple of steps (router creation, verification checks) lacking concrete examples.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery loop to step 6 (結果を検証する): state what to do when a check fails, e.g. 'if stale language rules are still active, remove them and re-run the check' — this completes the validate→fix→retry cycle expected for batch install operations.
Make verification executable: give a concrete command or checklist example, such as comparing `ls .claude/skills/` output against the DAILY inventory, so the checks are copy-paste ready rather than implied.
Provide a short template (or a reference file) for the optional `skill-library` router SKILL.md so its creation is concrete instead of a bulleted description of what it should contain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is procedural throughout — command blocks, classification criteria, an evidence-table format, an output template — with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. It fits the 4 anchor ('efficient; minor instances… that could be trimmed'): the 使用タイミング section duplicates the frontmatter description, and 分類モデル/非交渉ルール partly restate workflow steps 3–4. Not 5 because that redundancy exists; not 3 because the padding is minor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is pervasive: the 'rg --files / rg -n "typescript|react|…" / cat package.json' command block, worked evidence-table rows ('skills/frontend-patterns | skill | DAILY | 84 .tsx files…'), the router path '.claude/skills/skill-library/SKILL.md', and the output format template. It matches the 4 anchor ('mostly executable… with minor gaps') rather than 5 because the verification step and the router creation lack concrete examples or commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The core workflow is a clearly ordered 6-step sequence with explicit promotion/demotion criteria and a real validation step (step 6: confirm DAILY files exist, stale rules inactive, no incompatible hooks, install matches stack, then report counts) — so the batch-operation cap at 3 does not apply since validation is present. It sits at the 4 anchor rather than 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop: what to do when a verification check fails is left implicit (only '未解決の質問' is reported). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single, self-contained SKILL.md (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle) with well-organized sections, no buried references, and no nested lookups. All content is procedural and appropriately inline, matching the 4 anchor ('good structure; most content is appropriately placed'). Not 5 — the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply at ~215 lines, and the router SKILL.md spec and evidence-command list could arguably live in reference files; not 3 because nothing is disorganized or buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |