Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent lean pattern reference: terse rules plus complete, executable Kotlin/SQL covering every layer, with no wasted tokens. Its main weaknesses are the absence of an explicit application workflow with validation checkpoints, and inlining of detailed tool-specific content that could live in one-level-deep reference files. Overall a strong, high-actionability skill body.
Suggestions
Add an explicit ordered workflow for applying the patterns (e.g., 1. define module layout and dependency rules, 2. write domain models/repository interfaces, 3. implement data layer + mappers, 4. wire DI) with a validation step such as running ./gradlew :domain:dependencies to verify the domain module has no framework dependencies — this addresses the workflow_clarity gap.
Convert the "避けるべきアンチパターン" list into a post-implementation checklist with concrete verification commands (e.g., grep the domain module's imports for 'android' to enforce "純粋な Kotlin のみ").
Move the tool-specific deep dives (Room/SQLDelight/Ktor data-source code, Gradle convention plugins) into references/ files such as references/data-layer.md and references/gradle-conventions.md, keeping SKILL.md as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is a single terse rule followed by executable code ("各 UseCase は 1 つのビジネス操作を表します"; "ドメインモデルはプレーンな Kotlin データクラス — フレームワークのアノテーションなし"; "マッパーはデータモデルの近くに拡張関数として保持する") with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready examples cover the common cases: UseCases with "suspend operator fun invoke", a complete ItemRepositoryImpl coordinating local/remote sources with runCatching, mapper extension functions, Room @Entity/@Dao with @Upsert and Flow queries, SQLDelight .sq schema, Ktor client with ContentNegotiation, Koin and Hilt modules, and sealed AppError/Try types. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized as a pattern reference with an implicit layer ordering (module structure → domain → data → DI → error handling) but no explicit step sequence for applying the patterns and no validation checkpoints (e.g., how to verify the domain module stays framework-free); the "避けるべきアンチパターン" list partially acts as a review checklist, which keeps it at anchor 3 rather than 2, but it does not reach 4 since no sequenced workflow with checkpoints is actually written. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section headers ("モジュール構造", "ドメイン層", "データ層", "依存性注入", "エラー処理") make the single ~330-line file easy to navigate, and the cross-skill pointers are clearly signaled ("UI パターンは compose-multiplatform-patterns を参照"); not 5 because tool-specific deep dives (Room/SQLDelight/Ktor code, Gradle convention plugins) are inlined where one-level-deep reference files would keep SKILL.md an overview — no bundle files exist, so there are no broken references to penalize. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |