Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a concrete template, clear multi-step workflow, and explicit validation checkpoints; only progressive disclosure and minor conciseness tweaks remain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and focused on what Claude doesn't already know (the adapted ADR template, workflow, lifecycle); only minor sections such as the categories table and Do/Don't lists could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready ADR template, concrete directory structure, index format, specific file paths (docs/adr/NNNN-decision-title.md), and exact fallback responses — fully actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The capture workflow is a clearly sequenced eight-step process with explicit consent validation before writing ('Only write... after explicit approval. If the user declines, discard the draft') and a feedback loop, satisfying the validation requirement for file-writing operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a single self-contained file (no nested references), though at ~180 lines some material (full ADR template, categories table) could optionally be split into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |