Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable methodology with an explicit sequenced workflow, evidence/validation checkpoints, and a ready-to-use output template. Its only real weakness is minor verbosity where rationale and bias-control notes restate earlier points.
Suggestions
Tighten 'Why these dimensions' and 'Bias controls' by merging redundancies with the dimension list and Anti-Patterns section to reclaim tokens.
Consider moving the full nine-dimension weights and anchor table into a reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, if the skill grows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence, avoiding generic concept explanations, but sections like 'Why these dimensions' and parts of 'Bias controls' restate points already made elsewhere and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, usable artifacts: a 1–5 anchor rubric, a numbered data-collection order, and a copy-ready profile-card template with a markdown table; minor gaps are the placeholder axis anchors that depend on the client brief. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is explicitly sequenced (establish brief → collect data in cheapest-signal-first order → score with evidence → calibrate across the set) with validation checkpoints ('No score without evidence', 'Calibrate across the set… adjust outliers') and anti-pattern feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a self-contained skill with no bundle files and clear section structure (When to Activate, dimensions, rubric, data collection, output format), so for a skill needing no external references the well-organized overview earns the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |