Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, efficient body: concrete interview scripts, an exact state schema with resume and terminal-state handling, input validation for multi-founder writes, and justified anti-patterns. The two residual gaps are a missing verification/recovery loop after state writes, and implicit rather than explicit navigation to the bundled module files in references/. No bundle content needs inlining — the split is appropriate.
Suggestions
Add a read-back verification step to the State write protocol (e.g. re-read state.json after writing and re-save if it fails to parse) to close the workflow's only missing feedback loop.
Make the module files' location explicit — reference them as references/10_purpose-why.md (or link them) in the module table so navigation does not rely on inference.
Optionally state in the Module sequence section that the per-module templates live in references/ and are filled in during each session, so the body/bundle relationship is self-describing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: it never explains what branding is or why interviewing works, and adds only non-obvious material (state schema, terminal-module null handling, path validation rules), matching the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete instructional guidance: verbatim projective-question scripts, an exact state.json JSON example, explicit participant-name and path validation rules, and scripted confirmation messages ("Module X saved. State updated. Next: Y.") — the instruction-skill equivalent of copy-paste-ready code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear with most checkpoints present — session-start state check, ordered modules with jump handling, saturation signal, and explicit terminal-state handling to avoid resume bugs — but there is no read-back or error-recovery loop after writing state.json (e.g. verifying the file parses before confirming), which the 5 anchor's feedback loops require. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All eight module files named in the body exist one level deep in references/ and map 1:1 to the module table, giving good structure; however the body never states their location (no references/ prefix or links), so navigation is inferred rather than clearly signaled — the minor organization gap of the 4 anchor, above the buried-references level at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |