browser-qa

Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/browser-qa/SKILL.md

Browser QA — Automated Visual Testing & Interaction

When to Use

After deploying a feature to staging/preview
When you need to verify UI behavior across pages
Before shipping — confirm layouts, forms, interactions actually work
When reviewing PRs that touch frontend code
Accessibility audits and responsive testing

How It Works

Uses the browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer) to interact with live pages like a real user.

Safety first — blast radius (run read-only by default)

Browser QA drives real auth and real user journeys, so treat the blast radius explicitly. Default to read-only: never run a mutating journey (checkout, payment, delete, mass-update) against a production URL — require an explicit opt-in and a staging/preview URL. Use seeded test credentials, never real production logins, and redact credentials/tokens/PII before saving any screenshot.

Phase 1: Smoke Test

1. Navigate to target URL
2. Check for console errors (filter noise: analytics, third-party)
3. Verify no 4xx/5xx in network requests
4. Screenshot above-the-fold on desktop + mobile viewport
5. Check Core Web Vitals: LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms
   (INP replaced FID in March 2024; thresholds per web.dev)

Phase 2: Interaction Test

1. Click every nav link — verify no dead links
2. Submit forms with valid data — verify success state
3. Submit forms with invalid data — verify error state
4. Test auth flow: login → protected page → logout (test creds only, never prod)
5. Test critical user journeys (checkout, onboarding, search)
   — read-only by default; only exercise mutating journeys against staging
     with explicit opt-in (see "Safety first" above)

Phase 3: Visual Regression

1. Screenshot key pages at 3 breakpoints (375px, 768px, 1440px)
2. Compare against committed baseline screenshots
   — no baseline ⇒ report INCONCLUSIVE, never a silent PASS
3. Flag layout shifts > 5px, missing elements, overflow
4. Check dark mode if applicable

Phase 4: Accessibility

1. Run axe-core or equivalent on each page
2. Flag WCAG 2.2 AA violations (contrast, labels, focus order)
3. Verify keyboard navigation works end-to-end
4. Check screen reader landmarks

Note: axe-core automatically covers roughly 30–40% of WCAG. A clean run is necessary, not sufficient — keyboard nav, focus order, and a screen-reader pass still need a manual check. Don't report "accessible" from an automated pass alone.

Output Format

## QA Report — [URL] — [timestamp]

### Smoke Test
- Console errors: 0 critical, 2 warnings (analytics noise)
- Network: all 200/304, no failures
- Core Web Vitals: LCP 1.2s ✓, CLS 0.02 ✓, INP 89ms ✓

### Interactions
- [✓] Nav links: 12/12 working
- [✗] Contact form: missing error state for invalid email
- [✓] Auth flow: login/logout working

### Visual
- [✗] Hero section overflows on 375px viewport
- [✓] Dark mode: all pages consistent

### Accessibility
- 2 AA violations: missing alt text on hero image, low contrast on footer links

### Verdict: SHIP WITH FIXES (2 issues, 0 blockers)
# verdict ∈ SHIP / SHIP WITH FIXES / DO NOT SHIP; use INCONCLUSIVE if no visual baseline

Integration

Works with any browser MCP:

mChild__claude-in-chrome__* tools (preferred — uses your actual Chrome)
Playwright via mcp__browserbase__*
Direct Puppeteer scripts

Pair with /canary-watch for post-deploy monitoring.

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Commit: 4092795

Last updated: 1 day ago
Created: 1 day ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.