Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable body with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete templates, but it leans long for a single file: the flagship example is repeated three times and nothing is split into reference files.
Suggestions
Tell the 'New Email' example once (in Step 1 or the closing example, not both) and drop the line-24 teaser plus the 'Traditional debugging checks' framing that re-explains basic debugging.
Move the detailed 'Example: The Bug That Inspired This Skill' and the 'Recommended agent split' block into a reference file (e.g. references/EXAMPLES.md) linked from the body, so SKILL.md stays an overview and progressive disclosure reaches score 3.
Tighten the six bug patterns to the minimal code that distinguishes each pattern; several comments restate what the code already shows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the 'New Email' example is retold three times (the line-24 teaser, the Step 1 store map, and the full 'Example: The Bug That Inspired This Skill' section) and 'Traditional debugging checks' restates concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready output templates (TOUCHPOINT, CLICK-PATH-NNN), six bug patterns with real JS/React code, and a specific store-map output format — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence (Map Stores → Audit Touchpoints → Report) with a per-touchpoint 6-point CHECK checklist and explicit parallelization ordering ('Agent 1 MUST complete first'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned but a single ~245-line file with no references; the inspirational example and agent-split detail are inline that could be split out, and the score-3 anchor requires one-level-deep references that are absent. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |