Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable guide with concrete JSON examples for every step type and a strong validation-oriented workflow. Minor tightening of the `ref` section and an explicit retry loop on validation failure would lift it further.
Suggestions
Add an explicit "if validation fails, fix the anchor and re-verify" retry loop to the Validate step to reach the 5 anchor for workflow clarity.
Tighten the `ref` field section — the core trap can be stated in fewer tokens without losing the gotcha.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the `ref` field section is a fairly lengthy explanation; while justified by a non-obvious gotcha, it could be tightened slightly, placing it just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step type ships with a complete, copy-paste-ready JSON example, the path template `.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour` is concrete, and the full example tour covers the common cases end to end. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Discover → Infer reader → Verify anchors → Write → Validate) with explicit validation checklists in steps 3 and 5, but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, so it sits below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear section headers and no nested references; content is appropriately self-contained, though the file is longer than the simple-skill threshold that would warrant a 5 on structure alone. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |