Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers specific, well-sequenced report-assembly guidance with strong anti-patterns and decision framing, but redundancy between the positioning brief, framing principle, and presentation sections inflates token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
Merge 'Framing principle' into 'Client positioning brief' (or cut it entirely) and state the brand-balance flagging rule once, in the section where recommendations are made, rather than three times.
Trim 'How to present data' to only the items not already specified in sections 2 and 4 (e.g., the quadrant callouts and appendix discipline), removing the restated map/heatmap guidance.
Add a short final verification loop, e.g., 'Before delivery, confirm the report resolves the three decision-framework questions and every recommendation cites its matrix evidence,' to close the workflow-clarity validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The guidance is domain-specific and free of concepts Claude already knows, but there is real duplication: the 'Framing principle' section restates the 'Client positioning brief' (brand-balance flagging appears three times) and 'How to present data' re-describes sections 2 and 4. This is more than the minor trimming of anchor 4, though well short of anchor 2's padded verbosity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete for an instruction-only skill: a numbered eight-section spec with counts ('3-5 takeaways', '3-5 most instructive competitors'), an explicit prohibition ('Do not add a blended total column'), verbatim flagging phrasing, and worked micro-examples. Falls short of anchor 5 only in lacking a sample section or matrix snippet. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (positioning brief, then sections 1-8, then decision framework and trigger questions) with a prerequisite gate ('Starting before all profile cards are complete') and a decision-framework checklist. Not anchor 5 because there is no explicit verify-output feedback loop before delivery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear headers, no nested references, and content appropriately inline for a report-assembly skill. Not anchor 5: the body exceeds 50 lines with no bundle files, and some sections (trigger questions, presentation notes) overlap content that is already covered. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |