CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

configure-ecc

Claude Code、Codex、Kimi 内で ECC のインストール、更新、再設定を案内し、各ハーネスが実際に備えるプラグイン、スコープ、フック機能を守ります。

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/ja-JP/skills/configure-ecc/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly written, actionable multi-harness configuration workflow with strong validation checkpoints and error recovery, well-structured by harness; its main gaps are placeholder-dependent commands and inline-only content with no reference files.

Suggestions

Factor the per-harness command details into a reference file (e.g. references/harness-flows.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links to improve progressive disclosure.

Reduce duplication of the fallback npx command blocks (e.g. state the fallback once and reference it) to tighten conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is instruction-dense with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows, but repeats fallback npx command blocks and a few phrases across sections, keeping it just below the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable bash commands and a precise argument array for each harness, but commands rely on placeholders (<scope>, <hooks>, <action>, <installed-version>) that must be substituted, so they are not strictly copy-paste ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequence (inventory → collect → preview/confirm → apply → verify) with explicit validation checkpoints (exit code 0, scope/hooks match, ecc@ecc count, version pattern, doctor) and error-recovery guidance, satisfying the destructive-operation validation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into per-harness sections with numbered subsections and clear navigation, and no bundle files are needed; falls short of 5 only because all content is inline with no one-level-deep reference split.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive, clearly scoping ECC setup to Claude Code, Codex, and Kimi in third-person voice, but it omits an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when ...' clause (e.g. 'Use when the user asks to install, update, or reconfigure ECC in Claude Code, Codex, or Kimi') to make the trigger explicit and lift completeness.

Include common synonyms or natural phrasings users might say (e.g. 'ECC setup', 'ECC をセットアップ') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the ECC domain and several concrete actions — 'インストール、更新、再設定' (install, update, reconfigure) and protecting 'プラグイン、スコープ、フック機能' — with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the 'lists several specific actions' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (guide ECC install/update/reconfigure across three harnesses and protect their features) but there is no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit 'when' clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say ('ECC', 'インストール', '更新', '再設定', 'Claude Code/Codex/Kimi') with good coverage, but lacks synonyms or file-extension variants that would lift it to 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — ECC configuration across three specifically named harnesses — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.