CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

configure-ecc

Run the conversational ECC setup wizard inside the current harness: inventory the install, collect scope (user/project/local) and hook mode (off/minimal/standard/strict) in Claude Code, use Codex's native plugin lifecycle, or install the project surface under ./.kimi-code, then preview, apply, and verify. Use when installing, updating, reconfiguring, or repairing an ECC installation, changing hook profiles, or moving ECC between install scopes.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong, highly operational skill: fully executable commands with validation checkpoints, confirmation gating, and explicit recovery behavior across all three harnesses. The only weaknesses are mild redundancy in cross-harness warnings and a missed opportunity to split per-harness procedures into reference files rather than keeping ~200 lines inline.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated warning about not mapping Claude hook profiles onto Codex/Kimi into a single statement in the routing section, removing the near-duplicate sentences in the Codex and Kimi sections.

Move the per-harness procedures (Claude Code, Codex, Kimi) into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., references/claude-setup.md) and keep the routing table plus a short summary per harness in SKILL.md, so only the relevant procedure is loaded into context.

Merge the near-duplicate version-string guardrail sentences ('Reject unexpected version text instead of interpolating it into a shell command' and 'Never construct a shell command from Codex JSON values') into one shared security note.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of plugins, npx, or hooks basics), but the warning not to map Claude hook profiles onto other harnesses is stated three times ('Do not offer Claude scopes or map ECC's four Claude hook profiles onto Codex', 'do not ask the Claude four-profile hook question', 'Never claim that Claude's off | minimal | standard | strict profiles were applied to Codex') and the version-string guardrails near-duplicate each other. This matches 'efficient; minor instances... that could be trimmed' rather than 'every token earns its place'.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every step has copy-paste-ready commands with enumerated placeholder values ('user | project | local', 'off | minimal | standard | strict'), explicit fallbacks when $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT is unavailable, exact Codex commands and an exact argument array, and full Kimi commands. Fully executable with the common cases covered, matching the top anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor at 4.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequence (inventory → collect exactly two choices → preview/confirm once → apply → verify) with explicit validation gates: 'Require a zero exit status and a setup result whose scope and hooks equal the selected values', an independent re-run of 'claude plugin list --json', 'Continue only when exactly one enabled ecc@ecc entry exists at the selected scope', and stop-and-report recovery for ambiguous states. Validation and error-recovery are explicit, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so everything is inline in one well-sectioned SKILL.md with a clear harness-routing header structure and coherent sections — good structure with easy navigation. However, the ~110-line Claude Code section (and the Codex/Kimi sections) could be split into one-level-deep per-harness reference files with routing kept in the overview, which is why this is 'minor organization gaps' rather than the 'content appropriately split' top anchor. It is clearly above the 'content that should be separate is inline' with weak structure described at 3.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it states a concrete multi-step 'what', gives an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause covering install/update/repair/reconfigure/migrate scenarios, and names the per-harness variations so it is unlikely to fire for unrelated tasks. Third-person imperative voice is used correctly with no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'inventory the install, collect scope (user/project/local) and hook mode (off/minimal/standard/strict)... then preview, apply, and verify' — plus distinct per-harness behaviors (Claude Code wizard, Codex native plugin lifecycle, Kimi project surface under ./.kimi-code). Coverage is comprehensive with no gaps, matching the top anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor at 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (run the wizard: inventory, collect scope and hook mode, preview, apply, verify) with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing concrete triggers. Both halves are fully explicit, matching the top anchor; anchor 4 requires a 'when' that is only partially explicit.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when installing, updating, reconfiguring, or repairing an ECC installation, changing hook profiles, or moving ECC between install scopes' covers the natural phrases a user would say for this domain (set up, update, fix, change hooks, move scope). No file extensions apply to this task type, and no natural trigger phrasing is missing, so it fits the comprehensive anchor rather than the 'a few natural terms missing' anchor at 4.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers are ECC-specific ('ECC installation', 'hook profiles', 'install scopes'), defining a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against generic setup or plugin-management skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.