Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is structured and supplies useful config and hook examples, but it embeds extraneous research notes, references missing script/spec files, and lacks validation steps for its automated batch workflow.
Suggestions
Remove or relocate the '比較筆記 / Homunculus comparison' and '為什麼用 Stop Hook' sections into a separate reference file to trim the context load.
Add the actual evaluate-session.sh script (or its contents) and the referenced docs/continuous-learning-v2-spec.md so references resolve to real bundle files.
Insert validation checkpoints into the workflow (e.g. verify a session meets min length, confirm a detected pattern before saving) to support the batch extraction operation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient (config example, pattern table, hook setup) but the entire Homunculus comparison-notes section and 'why Stop Hook' rationale are padding Claude does not need to execute the skill. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete config.json and hook JSON, but the referenced evaluate-session.sh is not shown and the actual extraction logic is missing, leaving key execution details absent. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three steps are sequenced but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and for batch/automated operations the rubric caps workflow_clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are organized, but the comparison notes and v2 spec belong in separate files and references point to non-existent bundle files (evaluate-session.sh, docs/continuous-learning-v2-spec.md). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |