CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

council

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

75

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is tdg-personal/council

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-crafted, concise, and fully actionable skill body: executable templates, an explicit sequenced workflow with bias guardrails, and clean section organization appropriate to a single-purpose skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and purposeful throughout — no explaining of concepts Claude already knows (what subagents are, what anchoring is); every section earns its place, e.g. the prompt template and verdict shape are given directly.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready prompt and output templates, explicit per-role emphasis, and a concrete six-step workflow with exact response fields (Position, Reasoning, Risk, Surprise).

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit anti-anchoring checkpoints (write the Architect position first, launch subagents with only the question, synthesis guardrails); the decision-making task is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (When to Use, When NOT to Use, Roles, Workflow, Anti-Patterns, Related Skills, Example) and no need for external bundle files; navigation is clear and one-level-deep via named related skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger terms and a distinct niche that avoids overlap with related skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'Convene a four-voice council', 'ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls' — which sits above the 1-2-action anchor (3) but just shy of fully comprehensive (5).

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, go/no-go calls) and 'when' ('Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing') with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural phrases users would say — 'ambiguous decisions', 'tradeoffs', 'go/no-go calls', 'multiple valid paths', 'structured disagreement' — with good synonym coverage but a few common variants missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche (structured disagreement under ambiguity) and the body's 'When NOT to Use' table actively redirects overlapping tasks to other skills, minimizing conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.