CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

delivery-gate

Stop hook that blocks Claude from finishing until quality checks pass. Detects rationalization patterns (surface text heuristics), stale learning logs (filesystem mtime), and low disk space. Complements self-audit by mechanically enforcing learning capture habits. Use when Claude should be mechanically blocked from declaring work finished before quality checks and learning capture actually pass.

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Delivery Gate — Mechanical Quality Gate for Claude Code

A Stop hook that checks three things before Claude can finish a session, using only deterministic checks — file modification timestamps, disk usage, and regex patterns on the transcript text. No AI inference.

This is distinct from reasoning gates (like self-audit): delivery-gate checks machine-verifiable facts; self-audit checks output quality across four reasoning dimensions. Together they form defense in depth:

  • delivery-gate: "Was the learning library touched today? Is disk space safe?"
  • self-audit: "Is the file content correct, complete, and honest?"

This is the same pattern as CI pipeline gates — automated, deterministic checks that verify machine-readable facts rather than trusting self-reported status.

What It Checks

CheckMechanismOn Hit
Rationalization patternsRegex on transcript tailWarning only (never blocks)
Stale learning librariesmtime on 5 configurable pathsWarning if some stale; Block on a complex task if >=3 stale OR growth-log stale
Disk space < 50GBshutil.disk_usageReminder
Disk space < 30GBshutil.disk_usageWarning
Disk space < 15GBshutil.disk_usageBlock (exit 2), on every Stop

Rationalization detection warns about patterns like "skip tests for now" and "pre-existing bug" — surface signals that thinking may have been cut short. It never blocks on its own, because regex heuristics can false-positive. The blocking conditions are: disk critical (any session), or, on a complex task (>=3 Edit/Write calls), >=3 learning libs stale OR growth-log specifically stale. If the project memory directory does not exist, the learning-library checks are skipped: the hook only warns that it cannot verify learning capture, and a complex task is not blocked (the disk checks still apply).

The hook blocks a given Stop at most once. When Claude Code re-runs it with stop_hook_active: true (Claude already continued once because of this hook), it exits 0, so a condition the agent cannot fix (such as low disk space) cannot trap the session in an endless loop.

Why

Claude Code's built-in checks cover code quality (build → type → lint → test). But there's a different failure mode: the agent produces working code while the session hygiene was neglected — learning not captured, rationalized shortcuts, disk running out silently.

Over many sessions of "ship and forget," the human hasn't grown. This hook enforces the habit: complex task → must touch learning libraries.

Install

From the ECC repository root:

mkdir -p ~/.claude/scripts
cp skills/delivery-gate/hooks/quality-gate.py ~/.claude/scripts/

Add to ~/.claude/settings.json:

{
  "hooks": {
    "Stop": [{
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "python3 ~/.claude/scripts/quality-gate.py",
        "timeout": 5
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Learning Libraries

Create these files in your project's memory directory (~/.claude/projects/<encoded-project-path>/memory/, where every non-alphanumeric character of the project path becomes -). The hook checks which of them were updated today:

memory/
├── growth-log/          # Daily learning entries (directory)
├── decisions/log.md     # Decision log
├── output-index.md      # Index of session outputs
├── ratings-tracker.md   # Skill ratings over time
└── tooling_capabilities.md  # Known tools inventory

Customize the LIBS dict to match your own file structure.

Configuration

Edit quality-gate.py:

VariableDefaultPurpose
RATIONALIZE4 patternsRegex patterns for rationalization detection
LIBS5 librariesFiles/dirs to check for today's updates
COMPLEX_THRESHOLD3Edit/Write calls to classify as complex
DISK_REMIND_GB50Remind below this
DISK_WARN_GB30Warn below this
DISK_CRIT_GB15Block below this

Examples

Simple session — allowed:

edit_count=1 (< 3, not complex) → exit 0

Complex task, learning captured — allowed:

edit_count=5 (complex) → checks LIBS → growth-log + 2 others updated today (2 stale) → exit 0

Complex task, no learning — BLOCKED:

edit_count=4 (complex) → checks LIBS → all 5 stale → exit 2
stderr: "Blocked: complex task but >=3 learning libs stale."

Low disk space — BLOCKED:

disk_free=12GB < 15GB critical → exit 2
stderr: "Blocked: disk space at 12GB (<15GB). Free space before continuing."

Limitations

The hook enforces the habit of touching learning libraries, not the quality of what was recorded. On a complex task it passes only when growth-log was updated today and at most 2 libraries are stale; updating output-index.md alone still blocks. Without a project memory directory there is nothing to check, so it only warns. This is by design: mechanical gates check machine-verifiable facts. For content quality verification, pair with self-audit.

Compatibility

  • Python 3.8+ (uses from __future__ import annotations)
  • Cross-platform: Windows, macOS, Linux
  • Zero dependencies beyond stdlib

Quality

This code went through 4 rounds of automated code review (CodeRabbit + Greptile) with 9 real bugs found and fixed.

See Also

  • self-audit — Reasoning quality gate (completeness/consistency/groundedness/honesty)
  • verification-loop — Code quality checks (build/type/lint/test)
  • gateguard — PreToolUse safety gate
Repository

affaan-m/ECC

Path

skills/delivery-gate/SKILL.md

Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.