Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and clear, with concrete examples and a clean decision table. The main gap is that the referenced implementation file quality-gate.py is not bundled, slightly weakening actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship quality-gate.py in a scripts/ bundle so the 'cp quality-gate.py ~/.claude/scripts/' install step is actually executable.
Trim the 'Why' section and the CI-pipeline analogy to reduce token overhead without losing the core motivation.
Link the See Also entries (self-audit, verification-loop, gateguard) to their actual skill paths so the contrast is navigable rather than name-only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tight tables and concrete examples, but the 'Why' section and the CI-pipeline analogy add mild over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete install commands, a settings.json snippet, a configuration table, and exit-code examples, but references quality-gate.py which is not present in the bundle, leaving a gap in copy-paste readiness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'What It Checks' decision table plus the Examples section make the gate flow unambiguous; this is a single-purpose gate rather than a destructive/batch operation, so the 3-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md with clear sections and no nested references; however quality-gate.py is referenced as the implementation but is absent from the scripts/ bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |