deployment-patterns

Flujos de trabajo de despliegue, patrones de pipeline CI/CD, contenedorización Docker, health checks, estrategias de rollback y listas de verificación de preparación para producción de aplicaciones web.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced deployment reference with concrete code and checklists, but it is a large monolithic file with no progressive disclosure and could be tightened.

Suggestions

Split the full per-language Dockerfiles and the complete GitHub Actions workflow into referenced files (e.g. references/dockerfiles.md, references/pipeline.md) to improve progressive disclosure and conciseness.

Trim redundant inline detail — keep one representative Dockerfile inline and point to the others — to move conciseness toward 3.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	It is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but ships three full multi-stage Dockerfiles and a complete GitHub Actions workflow inline, which could be tightened — matching 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the fully lean score-3 anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	Real executable Dockerfiles, GitHub Actions YAML, Kubernetes probes, TypeScript health-check code, Zod env validation and concrete rollback commands make the guidance copy-paste ready, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Sequenced pipeline stages (lint→typecheck→tests→deploy) plus explicit Rollback and Production Readiness checklists provide clear sequences with validation checkpoints, matching the score-3 'checklists for complex processes' anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The ~428-line skill is a single inline monolith with no bundle files or 'See X.md' references, so content that could be split (full Dockerfiles/pipeline YAML) is inline — the 'content that should be separate is inline' score-2 anchor rather than a well-split score-3.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-triggered capability list in third person, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, capping completeness at 2.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Úsalo cuando se configuren pipelines CI/CD, se contenedorice con Docker, se planifique un despliegue o se prepare un lanzamiento a producción' to lift completeness to 3.

Include common natural variations users might say (e.g. 'desplegar', 'deploy', 'despliegue blue-green/canary') to broaden trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description lists multiple concrete capabilities — 'patrones de pipeline CI/CD, contenedorización Docker, health checks, estrategias de rollback y listas de verificación de preparación para producción' — matching the 'Lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the single-action score-2 anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	It clearly answers 'what does this do' but has no explicit 'Use when.../Úsalo cuando...' trigger clause, so 'when' is only implied — the rubric caps completeness at 2 for a missing explicit trigger.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like 'CI/CD', 'Docker', 'health checks', 'rollback' and 'producción' are natural vocabulary a user would say when needing this skill, giving good coverage rather than the partial score-2 case.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Deployment pipelines, Docker, health checks and rollback form a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not the generic/overlapping score-2 case.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Commit: 4130457

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.