Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable, well-structured guide that respects Claude's intelligence and sequences the workflow explicitly. Main improvement areas are tightening minor redundancy and adding an explicit error-recovery loop after the call limit is reached.
Suggestions
Add a brief validate-and-retry step: if query-docs returns irrelevant results, refine the query and retry before hitting the 3-call limit.
Consolidate the intro, 'Core Concepts', and 'When to use' sections to remove overlapping phrasing and reduce token usage.
Show one literal tool-call invocation example (parameter names and values) so the steps are directly copy-pasteable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what libraries or MCP are; minor redundancy between the intro, 'Core Concepts', and 'When to use' sections could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance with specific tool parameters (libraryName, query, libraryId) and worked examples using real library IDs like '/vercel/next.js'; minor gaps such as not showing literal tool-call syntax. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step sequence (resolve, select, fetch, use) with an explicit 3-call limit and a fallback ('state the uncertainty') checkpoint, but lacks a validate-and-retry error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with well-organized, clearly labeled sections and no nested references; slightly exceeds the simple-skill line budget, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |