Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with a sensible fallback rule, and it is well-organized for a self-contained single-purpose skill. The main improvement is trimming the redundant Examples section that repeats the documented workflow.
Suggestions
Collapse the three near-identical Examples into one worked example plus a short table of library/ID pairs, since 'How it works' already covers the step sequence.
Optionally move the per-tool parameter reference into a compact table to tighten the 'How it works' steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the three near-identical Examples (Next.js, Prisma, Supabase) re-walk the same 4-step flow already covered in 'How it works', adding padding that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool names with their exact parameters (libraryName, query, libraryId) and example values like '/vercel/next.js' give copy-paste-ready, fully specified guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (resolve → select → fetch → use) with an explicit retry/fallback rule (max 3 calls, then state uncertainty) provides the checkpoint behavior the rubric rewards; the operation is read-only so destructive-validation caps do not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained single-task skill with no bundle files, organized into clearly labeled sections (Core Concepts, When to use, How it works, Examples, Best Practices) and no nested references — well-structured for discovery. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |