Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable cross-language code and a useful checklist, organized into clear sections. It is slightly verbose from duplicated hierarchies across languages and lacks an explicit end-to-end validated workflow, but overall well-structured for a single-file skill.
Suggestions
Consolidate the near-identical TypeScript and Python AppError/exception hierarchies or move one to a reference file to reduce duplication and token cost.
Add one short end-to-end workflow (e.g., identify error → classify → map to response) with an explicit validation checkpoint, rather than only a post-hoc checklist.
Move the longer inline examples (API error handler, retry implementation) into a references/ file and link from the body to tighten the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with code-forward sections and minimal concept explanation, though the repeated near-identical AppError hierarchies across TypeScript/Python and inline API-handler examples add some length that could be trimmed. It is efficient but not maximally so. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code across TypeScript, Python, and Go covering typed errors, Result types, API handlers, error boundaries, sentinel wrapping, retry-with-backoff, and user-message mapping — concrete and complete for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Core principles, per-language patterns, and a closing checklist give a clear sequenced mental model with an explicit verification checklist, but there is no single end-to-end workflow with explicit validation checkpoints for batch/destructive cases (the checklist partially compensates). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (When to Activate, Core Principles, per-language blocks, Retry, Messages, Checklist) with no nested references and no bundle files; for a single-file skill this is good structure, though some per-language reference content could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |