Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a thorough, actionable eval-driven-development guide with clear workflow sequencing and concrete commands/templates. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between the workflow and the auth example, and a monolithic inline structure with no progressive disclosure to reference files.
Suggestions
Move the lengthy '例：認証の追加' worked example and the detailed eval/grader templates into separate reference files (e.g. references/eval-templates.md) and link to them, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview.
Tighten the redundant auth example — it repeats the 評価ワークフロー steps; condense it or reference the workflow instead of restating it.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow, e.g. 'if any eval FAILS, fix the code and re-run until pass@3 > 90%', to make validation checkpoints explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and well-structured, but the lengthy '例：認証の追加' worked example largely duplicates the 評価ワークフロー section, and the philosophy block restates concepts that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides executable bash commands (grep -q, npm test, npm run build), slash commands (/eval define|check|report), and copy-paste-ready eval templates, with only minor placeholder gaps such as '[各能力評価を実行し、PASS/FAILを記録]'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 定義→実装→評価→レポート sequence is clear and numbered, and PASS/FAIL recording acts as verification, but there is no explicit fail→fix→re-run feedback loop in the main workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle/reference files exist and all content — including the long worked example and full templates — is inlined in a ~220-line SKILL.md; section headers give structure, but content that belongs in separate reference files is not split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |