Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, executable single-file skill with concrete commands and a clear workflow. Conciseness and workflow clarity are strong but not maximal, and with no bundle files progressive disclosure is rated on clean single-file structure rather than file splitting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (no explanations of BLAST/Ensembl basics), but the Installation section plus the uv variant and the 'Before relying on an older environment' note add a few lines that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready CLI commands (gget search/info/seq/blast with flags and output files) and runnable Python snippets cover the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step Common workflow plus a Reproducibility Log template and Review Checklist give an explicit sequence with most checkpoints present; validation is softer (check docs, run small query first) than the validate-fix-retry loop the 5 anchor describes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced; the body is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and external reference URLs, which is good structure but does not demonstrate the split-file, one-level-deep reference pattern the 5 anchor describes. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |