investor-materials

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient skill body with a clear single-source-of-truth workflow and explicit validation gates. Its main weakness is the absence of worked examples or templates that would make the per-asset guidance immediately copy-adaptable.

Suggestions

Add one compact worked example for the weakest artifact type — e.g., a 3-line sample use-of-funds table showing raise amount, category splits, and milestone linkage — to lift actionability to copy-paste-ready.

Expand each Core Workflow step with a one-line concrete action (e.g., "inventory the canonical facts" → "list traction, pricing, raise size, use of funds, team, milestones in a table and mark conflicts") so the sequence is fully executable.

Include a short before/after example of an unverifiable claim vs. a defensible one in the Red Flags section to make the quality criteria concrete.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and bullet-driven throughout — it never explains concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what a pitch deck or financial model is) and every line adds guidance, matching the every-token-earns-its-place anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	Concrete guidance dominates: a 12-step deck flow, explicit financial-model contents, and a pre-delivery quality gate. It falls short of fully executable because there are no worked examples or templates (e.g., a sample use-of-funds table or memo sentence pattern), but it is well above the vague/pseudocode level.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The five-step core workflow is clearly sequenced and includes real checkpoints ("If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting" plus a Quality Gate checklist), but the steps themselves are terse (e.g., "inventory the canonical facts") without error-recovery detail, so minor validation gaps remain.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist or are needed; the ~90-line body is cleanly sectioned (When to Activate, Golden Rule, Core Workflow, per-asset guidance, Red Flags, Quality Gate) with nothing misplaced and trivial navigation, satisfying the well-organized single-file pattern.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with explicit what-and-when structure, comprehensive artifact coverage, and natural trigger terminology. The only gap is a handful of common fundraising synonyms that would push trigger-term coverage to fully comprehensive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials" comprehensively enumerates the concrete artifacts this skill produces, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the minor-gaps level.	5 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both questions: a clear "what" (the enumerated artifact types) and a concrete "Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans..." trigger clause.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms like "pitch decks", "one-pagers", "investor memos", "accelerator applications", and "use-of-funds tables" are strong, but common user phrasings such as "raise", "seed/Series A", "investor update", and "data room" are absent, placing it just below comprehensive.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The fundraising-materials niche is clearly staked out with distinct investor-facing triggers and third-person voice, so minimal conflict risk with other skills; it only nominally overlaps presentation skills via the pitch-deck artifact.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: skills/investor-materials/SKILL.md
Commit: c70874f

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.