investor-materials

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: concise, with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/feedback steps, and a quality-gate checklist. The only soft spot is a handful of abstract action verbs in the workflow that could be made more prescriptive.

Suggestions

Replace abstract verbs like "draft the asset with explicit logic" and "cross-check every number" with a concrete, repeatable check step (e.g., "paste each number next to its source-of-truth row and confirm equality").

Add one short worked example (e.g., a sample use-of-funds table summing to the raise size) so the consistency rule is unambiguous.

Make the Golden Rule's "single source of truth" concrete by specifying where it lives (a named table/section) so Claude knows what to create or confirm.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and efficient throughout — terse lists, no explaining of concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its tokens (e.g., the Core Workflow is five compressed imperatives).	5 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, actionable guidance (12-step deck flow, one-pager bullets, financial-model inclusions, Quality Gate checklist), but a few verbs remain abstract ("draft the asset with explicit logic", "cross-check every number") rather than fully prescriptive.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step Core Workflow is paired with explicit validation ("cross-check every number against the source of truth"), a feedback loop ("If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting"), and a Quality Gate checklist before delivery.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (When to Activate, Golden Rule, Core Workflow, Asset Guidance, Red Flags, Quality Gate) and is appropriately self-contained with no need for external bundle references.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and well-scoped: it states concrete capabilities, provides an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, and carves out a distinct fundraising niche. The only minor gap is keyword synonym coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions ("Create and update") across a comprehensive set of asset types (pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, fundraising materials), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos...") and when ("Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables...") with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases users actually say ("pitch deck", "one-pager", "investor memo", "use-of-funds tables", "milestone plans"), but a few common synonyms (e.g., "fundraising deck", "data room", "cap table") are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear fundraising/investor-materials niche with distinct triggers (pitch decks, accelerator applications, use-of-funds), giving it minimal overlap with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: skills/investor-materials/SKILL.md
Commit: d8409a4

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.