Name: investor-materials
Rating: 72.8 (1 reviews)
Author: affaan-m

investor-materials

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is investor-materials in affaan-m/ECC

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured overview that respects the token budget and sequences work clearly with pre-draft and pre-delivery checkpoints. It falls just short of top marks on actionability and workflow clarity because it offers no worked examples or templates and no explicit error-recovery loop after the Quality Gate.

Suggestions

Add one compact worked example (e.g., a sample use-of-funds table or a filled-out one-pager skeleton) so the asset guidance is copy-ready rather than purely descriptive.

Extend the Quality Gate with an explicit recovery loop: what to do when a check fails (fix the source of truth, re-run the cross-check, then re-verify before delivery).

Give the cross-check step a concrete mechanism, such as a checklist of which documents to diff against the source-of-truth inventory.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with zero padding: "If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting" and the Quality Gate checklist instruct rather than explain, and no concept Claude already knows is restated. Every token earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Guidance is concrete (a numbered 12-slide deck flow, "bear / base / bull cases when useful", explicit red flags), but no worked examples, templates, or sample numbers are provided to make the guidance copy-ready. Fits the "mostly executable with minor gaps" anchor, not 5.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The Core Workflow is clearly sequenced and has a pre-draft conflict checkpoint ("stop and resolve them before drafting") plus a Quality Gate checklist, but there is no explicit loop back if the Quality Gate fails and "cross-check every number" lacks a verification mechanism. Minor validation gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and no content that clearly belongs in separate files; sections (When to Activate, Golden Rule, Core Workflow, Asset Guidance, Red Flags, Quality Gate) are well organized and the one external pointer (`frontend-slides`) is clearly signaled. Nothing is buried or nested.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it names concrete deliverables, gives an explicit and specific use-when clause, and occupies a distinct fundraising niche. The only improvement would be adding common fundraising synonyms (round, seed, Series A, raise) to the trigger terms.

Suggestions

Add natural fundraising synonyms such as "seed round", "Series A", or "raise" to the use-when clause to broaden trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials" lists multiple concrete deliverable types with comprehensive coverage, matching the top anchor rather than the minor-gaps level of 4.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both "what" (create and update six named deliverable types) and "when" ("Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables...") with concrete trigger phrases, so the when-clause is specific rather than merely present.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good natural-term coverage ("pitch decks", "one-pagers", "investor memos", "use-of-funds tables", "milestone plans") but common variations users would say, such as "fundraising round", "seed/Series A", or "raise", are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The investor/fundraising niche is clear and its triggers (investor memos, use-of-funds tables, accelerator applications) are domain-specific with minimal overlap risk against generic document or presentation skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: .agents/skills/investor-materials/SKILL.md
Commit: c70874f

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.