Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction-only skill: every section delivers non-obvious, skill-specific guidance and the Quality Gate provides an explicit validation checklist before delivery. The only material gap is the absence of a worked example draft, which would make the guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example (e.g., a filled-in 80-word cold email skeleton showing subject line, personalized opener, proof point, and single ask) to raise actionability to fully executable.
Optionally add a one-line example follow-up message to demonstrate 'one new data point' cadence in practice.
Consider adding a before/after pair of a generic vs. personalized opener to make the 'Never send generic copy' rule concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line carries skill-specific guidance ('keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words', 'day 4-5: short follow-up with one new data point'). Every token earns its place, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable — a five-part cold email structure, exact follow-up cadence days, a word limit, and named personalization sources — but there is no worked example (e.g., a skeleton cold email), so it falls at anchor 4 ('mostly executable guidance with minor gaps') rather than the copy-paste-ready bar of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-purpose drafting task, the sequence is unambiguous and includes an explicit pre-delivery validation checklist ('Quality Gate') plus a conditional checkpoint ('If that context is missing, ask for it or state that the draft is a template awaiting personalization'), meeting the score-5 bar under the simple-skill guideline. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill needs no external references, and the body is compact and organized into clear sections (activation, rules, structures, cadences, quality gate). Per the rubric's guideline for self-contained skills, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |