Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable guide with executable code across all four phases, a clear looping workflow with a stop condition, and sensible one-level references. Its main gap is the absence of explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints in the loop and a few undefined helper functions in the examples.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the loop (e.g., verify retrieved files actually exist and are parseable before scoring, and surface a clear 'retrieval failed' path) to push workflow clarity toward the explicit-validation anchor.
Either define or note the assumed helper functions (`retrieveFiles`, `scoreRelevance`, `explainRelevance`, `identifyGaps`, `extractPatterns`, `mergeContext`) so the code is fully copy-paste executable rather than relying on implied implementations.
Trim the ASCII diagram and the high/medium/low/none scoring-band list, or move them to a reference file, to tighten conciseness further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with code that earns its place and minimal padding of known concepts; only minor prose (the diagram and scoring-band list) could be trimmed, sitting clearly above the 'mostly efficient' anchor but short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable JavaScript for each of the four phases plus a complete `iterativeRetrieve` function and two worked examples, with only minor gaps (undefined helper functions like `retrieveFiles`, `scoreRelevance`) keeping it from copy-paste completeness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-phase dispatch→evaluate→refine→loop sequence is clearly staged with an explicit stop condition (≥3 high-relevance files) and a built-in feedback loop; it lacks explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints, so it is above 'steps listed, validation gaps' but below the explicit-validation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-sectioned (when, problem, solution, examples, integration, best practices, related) with one-level references (external guide link, sibling `continuous-learning` skill, `agents/` path); no bundle files exist to over-fragment, so structure is good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |