CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ito-basket-compare

Compare Itô prediction-market baskets against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, financial context, watchlist, or research thesis. Use for read-only basket comparison and gap analysis without investment advice or live trading.

79

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Itô Basket Compare

Use this skill to compare a basket, theme, or market set against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, research memo, CRM context, or stated thesis.

This skill is read-only. It does not recommend trades. It helps a user inspect fit, exposure, assumptions, and missing context before they decide what to do.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide investment advice or tell the user to buy, sell, hold, hedge, lever, or size a trade.
  • Do not execute, prepare, or submit orders.
  • Do not use private documents unless the user explicitly points to them.
  • Use ITO_API_KEY only for read-only Itô basket/market data after explicit user request.
  • If comparing against financials, preserve privacy and summarize only the fields needed for the comparison.

Comparison Modes

Basket vs Knowledge Base

  1. Identify the basket theme and underliers.
  2. Retrieve the user's relevant notes, docs, or memory snippets.
  3. Map each underlier to claims, sources, uncertainties, and stale assumptions.
  4. Return aligned signals, conflicting signals, and missing research.

Basket vs Portfolio Notes

  1. Parse the user's watchlist, holdings summary, or exposure notes.
  2. Compare themes, geographies, time horizons, and event outcomes.
  3. Flag concentration, correlation, and duplicated narrative exposure.
  4. Avoid recommendations; phrase output as inspection and questions.

Basket vs Financial Context

  1. Accept only user-provided or explicitly selected financial context.
  2. Identify liquidity, drawdown, time-horizon, and constraint mismatches.
  3. Ask for missing constraints instead of guessing.

Output Contract

Use this structure:

  1. Basket summary
  2. Comparison target
  3. Matches
  4. Conflicts or stale assumptions
  5. Missing context
  6. User-action checklist

End with:

This comparison is informational and not investment or trading advice.
Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.