Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-organized instruction skill that respects token budget and structures itself cleanly, but its workflow steps are somewhat abstract and lack explicit validation checkpoints or executable examples.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of a read API call or a sample brief output so the workflow steps move from directive to executable.
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., 'Confirm every claim has a source link before producing the brief') to satisfy the validation requirement.
Tighten step 2 by naming specific venue docs/APIs or the exact data fields to pull, reducing the remaining abstraction in the guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned (Guardrails, Workflow, Skill Chains, Output Contract) with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance names concrete fields to normalize and supplies literal output templates, but workflow steps like "Gather public market data from venue docs/APIs" stay abstract with no executable examples or specific endpoint calls, leaving it incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps form a clear sequence and the brief's "open questions" acts as an implicit checkpoint, but there are no explicit validation/verification steps or feedback loops, which the 3-anchor requires. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~50 lines with no bundle files needed, the body is organized into clearly labeled sections that stand alone; this matches the simple-skill allowance for a 3 with well-organized sections and no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |