CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

logistics-exception-management

Codified freight-exception handling expertise for shipment delays, damages, losses, shortages, and carrier disputes, with escalation protocols, carrier-specific behaviors by mode, claims procedures, and eat-the-cost vs fight-the-claim judgment frameworks. Use when handling shipping exceptions, freight claims, delivery issues, or carrier disputes.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/logistics-exception-management/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, information-dense knowledge skill whose domain expertise (thresholds, deadlines, mode-specific behaviors, escalation triggers) is genuinely beyond what Claude already knows. Its weaknesses are the absence of any progressive disclosure — everything lives inline in one long file — and communication templates that outline rather than provide ready-to-use text.

Suggestions

Split reference-grade content into bundle files (e.g., references/carrier-behaviors.md, references/edge-cases.md, references/templates.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links, per the progressive-disclosure principle.

Expand the three communication templates into complete copy-paste-ready message bodies with placeholder variables, so the strongest actionable content is fully executable rather than structural.

Trim the persona-style "Role and Context" paragraph and connective framing sentences (e.g., the intro to "Carrier Behaviour by Mode") to reduce token overhead without losing domain specifics.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with genuine non-common knowledge — dollar thresholds ("< $500 and carrier relationship is strong: Absorb"), statutory deadlines ("9 months from delivery date for US domestic (49 USC § 14706)"), and mode-specific behaviors. It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 due to trimmable padding: the persona paragraph ("You are a senior freight exceptions analyst with 15+ years..."), TMS/WMS parenthetical glosses, and connective sentences like "Understanding how different carrier types operate changes your resolution strategy".

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is overwhelmingly concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact decision thresholds ("Reject settlements below 90%"), timelines ("Carrier has 30 days to acknowledge, 120 days to pay"), an evidence checklist ("Original BOL... delivery receipt... commercial invoice"), and ordered priorities. It misses anchor 5 because the communication templates are self-admittedly skeletal — "Brief templates appear below. Adapt them" — giving structure ("Lead with: what you know, what you're doing about it") rather than copy-paste-ready text.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

"How It Works" provides a clear 5-step sequence (classify → apply workflow → document → escalate → file/track), reinforced by time-based checkpoints ("Escalate at 30-day mark if no resolution", "Don't file shortage claim until all partials are reconciled") and the escalation trigger table. Not anchor 5 because validation/verification loops are implicit — there is no explicit validate-then-proceed step, and the KPI table is a monitoring afterthought rather than an in-workflow feedback loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section organization is good (clear headers, tables, consistent formatting), but this is a ~200-line single file with no bundle files at all: carrier-by-mode behavior detail, the eight edge-case playbooks, communication templates, and KPI tables are reference-grade content inlined into SKILL.md. It matches anchor 3 ("content that should be separate is inline") — better organized than anchor 2, but lacking the file-splitting of anchor 4. The "Additional Resources" section gestures at external material but points to generic internal documents rather than actual bundled references.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit, well-structured trigger clause and a clearly enumerated scope. Its main weakness is that capabilities are presented as knowledge domains rather than concrete actions, and a few natural trigger synonyms (e.g., "damaged shipment", "lost package") are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates several concrete capability areas — "escalation protocols, carrier-specific behaviors by mode, claims procedures, and eat-the-cost vs fight-the-claim judgment frameworks" — plus a full exception typology ("delays, damages, losses, shortages"). It stops short of anchor 5 because these are framed as topics/expertise domains rather than executable actions (e.g., "Files claims within statutory windows", "Classifies exceptions by severity").

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ("Codified freight-exception handling expertise for shipment delays, damages, losses, shortages, and carrier disputes, with escalation protocols...") and when ("Use when handling shipping exceptions, freight claims, delivery issues, or carrier disputes") with concrete trigger phrases, mirroring the anchor-5 example structure. Not anchor 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit, not vague.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger clause uses natural phrases a user would say — "shipping exceptions, freight claims, delivery issues, or carrier disputes" — matching the good-example pattern. It falls short of anchor 5 because common variations like "damaged shipment", "lost package", "shortage", "refused delivery", or "OS&D" are absent from the trigger list.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The freight-claims/Carmack-domain niche is clear and mostly distinct, as in anchor 4's "minor overlap risk with closely related skills". Not anchor 5 because "delivery issues" and "carrier disputes" are broad enough to overlap with general parcel-tracking, customer-support, or shipping-logistics skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

affaan-m/ECC

Path

skills/logistics-exception-management/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.