CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

market-research

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, concise instruction skill with concrete per-mode checklists and a delivery quality gate. It earns high marks on token efficiency and organization; actionability and workflow clarity sit just below top because there are no executable artifacts and no explicit error-recovery feedback loop.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop in the Quality Gate (e.g., 'If a claim lacks a source, re-search before delivering') to lift workflow_clarity toward 5.

Provide one short worked example (e.g., a sample sourced TAM estimate or competitor table) to make the guidance copy-paste ready and raise actionability.

Consider extracting the per-mode collection checklists into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g., MODES.md) signaled from the body to strengthen progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient throughout: tight bullet checklists, no padding explaining what market research is, and every line earns its place ('Produce research that supports decisions, not research theater.'). It assumes Claude's competence.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific checklists per research mode ('Collect: fund size, stage, and typical check size'; 'Use: top-down estimates... bottom-up sanity checks'), which is actionable for an instruction-only skill, but lacks copy-paste executable artifacts that would push it to 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence via numbered Research Standards, a default Output Format (1–6), and a Quality Gate checklist before delivery; the gate is a checkpoint but not a true validate→fix→retry feedback loop, leaving it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with no nested or buried references and no bundle files present; content is appropriately self-contained, though all material is inline with no one-level-deep references to split out.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it pairs a concrete capability statement with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause covering natural search terms. It is specific, complete, and largely distinct, with only minor room to add synonyms for top marks.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete research activities ('market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence') plus methodological qualifiers ('source attribution and decision-oriented summaries'), but the actions are activity categories rather than ultra-concrete operations, leaving minor gaps versus a 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Conduct market research... with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries') and when ('Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans...') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural keyword coverage ('market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans') that users would actually say, though a few synonyms/variations are absent, falling just short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear market-research niche with specific triggers, with only minor overlap risk against a general research or analysis skill.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.