CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nutrient-document-processing

使用Nutrient DWS API处理、转换、OCR识别、提取、编辑、签名和填写文档。支持PDF、DOCX、XLSX、PPTX、HTML和图像格式。

84

1.49x
Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

100%

1.49x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/zh-CN/skills/nutrient-document-processing/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

64%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid API reference skill with excellent actionability — every operation has complete, executable curl examples. The main weaknesses are the lack of error handling/validation guidance (important for operations like redaction) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files. Some sections like '使用场景' add little value for Claude.

Suggestions

Add error handling guidance: check HTTP response codes, handle common failures (401 auth errors, 415 unsupported format), and verify output file validity.

Remove the '使用场景' section — it restates what's already clear from the operation headings and adds no actionable information.

Move reference lists (supported formats, redaction presets, OCR languages) into a separate REFERENCE.md to reduce the main file's token footprint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient with concrete examples, but includes some unnecessary content like the '使用场景' (use cases) section which restates what's already obvious from the operations, and the supported formats list could be tighter. The introductory sentence also partially restates the heading.

2 / 3

Actionability

Every operation includes a complete, copy-paste-ready curl command with proper authentication headers, multipart form data, and JSON instructions. The examples cover all major use cases with real, executable commands.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Each operation is presented as a standalone API call which is clear for single-step tasks. However, there are no validation/verification steps (e.g., checking HTTP status codes, handling errors, verifying output), and no guidance on chaining operations or handling failures, which matters for batch/destructive operations like redaction.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear section headers and links to external documentation, but the body is quite long (~150 lines) with all operations inline. The redaction presets list, supported formats list, and OCR language details could be split into referenced files. No bundle files exist to offload this content.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

60%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description excels at listing specific capabilities and supported formats, providing a comprehensive view of what the skill does. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which is critical for Claude to know when to select this skill over others. The trigger terms are adequate but lean toward technical language rather than natural user phrasing.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user needs to convert, edit, sign, or extract content from documents, or when OCR is needed for scanned documents or images.'

Include more natural user-facing trigger terms and variations, such as 'scan documents', 'convert Word to PDF', 'fill out forms', 'extract text from images', 'e-sign', '.pdf', '.docx'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 处理 (process), 转换 (convert), OCR识别 (OCR recognition), 提取 (extract), 编辑 (edit), 签名 (sign), and 填写 (fill) documents. Also specifies supported formats (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, HTML, images).

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what does this do' with specific actions and supported formats, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance explaining when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, HTML, OCR, and document-related action terms. However, it misses common user-facing variations and natural language triggers (e.g., 'scan documents', 'convert to PDF', 'fill forms', '.pdf files'). The terms are somewhat technical (e.g., 'Nutrient DWS API') rather than user-natural.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'Nutrient DWS API' and the broad range of document formats (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, HTML, images) makes it somewhat distinctive, but the wide scope of supported formats and actions could overlap with other document-processing skills. It covers so many formats that it could conflict with format-specific skills.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.