Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured wrapper skill that assumes competence and points clearly to the shared engine. The only soft spots are that executable and feedback-loop detail live in the referenced engine rather than in the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding; assumes Claude knows what tests, commits, and reviews are, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete operation settings, named gates, and a worked example, but delegates the executable engine detail to orch-pipeline rather than inlining it, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence with explicit Gate 1 and Gate 2 checkpoints; the validate-fix-retry loop is delegated to the shared engine rather than spelled out inline, a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, no bundle files needed, well-organized sections, and a single one-level reference to orch-pipeline/SKILL.md — meets the simple-skill top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |