Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured orchestration skill with strong workflow gates and validation checkpoints and no token waste. Its one weakness is actionability: execution is delegated to an external engine not bundled here, and the example is illustrative rather than executable.
Suggestions
Add a minimal concrete command or invocation showing how the `orch-pipeline` engine is actually run, so the skill stands on its own rather than relying on an unbundled sibling.
Make the Example block distinguish input from action more explicitly (e.g., label the trigger request vs. the orchestrated steps) so it reads as a reproducible recipe.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — it never explains what a refactor is or how tests work, and every section (settings, how it works, example) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete operational settings (phase mask, gates, the `refactor:` commit prefix, named tools like knip/depcheck/ts-prune), but the actual executable mechanism is delegated to an unbundled `orch-pipeline` engine and the example is illustrative rather than copy-paste runnable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit with validation checkpoints — confirm tests green before touching code, re-run after each step, and stop at Gate 1 and Gate 2 — giving a clear feedback loop for a risky operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files, it is well-organized into clear sections and points one level deep to the `orch-pipeline` engine and `refactor-cleaner` agent with clearly signaled references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |