Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced pipeline, concrete component mappings, and copy-paste examples, but it is a long monolithic file with some frontmatter duplication and large reference tables that could be externalized into bundle files. Conciseness and progressive disclosure are the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the body's 'When to Use' / 'Do Not Use When' sections since they restate triggers already in the frontmatter description, saving tokens.
Extract the large tech-stack→skills/agents and intent→component mapping tables into a references/ file (e.g. COMPONENT_MAP.md) and link to it from SKILL.md, moving from a monolithic file toward one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Collapse the redundant quick-pattern table (Section 4) into the intent→components table (Phase 3) to eliminate overlapping content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~380-line body is mostly efficient domain-specific ECC mapping rather than generic concept explanation, but it duplicates frontmatter content (the 'When to Use'/'Do Not Use When' sections restate the description's triggers) and could tighten overlapping tables (intent→components vs. quick-pattern table). It matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the fully lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete ECC component mappings, exact workflow sequences with specific commands (/plan, /tdd, /verify), and three full copy-paste-ready optimized prompts in fenced blocks, matching the 'fully executable... copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-phase pipeline (Phase 0→5) with an explicit Phase 4 missing-context checklist and a gating rule ('If 3+ critical items are missing, ask the user up to 3 clarification questions') plus /verify gates in examples, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps... checklists' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent), so all content sits in a single ~380-line monolithic SKILL.md with large reference tables (tech-stack→skills, intent→components) that could be split into separate files. It matches 'some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline'; the under-50-line simple-skill carve-out does not apply here. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |