Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured operator guide that assumes competence, gives concrete tool-by-tool escalation rules, sequences a five-step workflow with verification checkpoints, and stays cleanly sectioned with no reference-depth problems.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense, assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what research or search is), and every section earns its place with no padding or verbosity. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance by naming specific skills with explicit escalation conditions ('use exa-search for fast discovery', 'escalate to deep-research when synthesis or multiple sources matter') plus a copy-ready output template, which is appropriately actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered five-step sequence (Start -> Classify -> Evidence path -> Report -> Monitor) is backed by an explicit Verification section with checkpoints (labeled evidence types, dated freshness-sensitive output, mode-match confirmation). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and content is organized into well-signaled sections (Skill Stack, When to Use, Guardrails, Workflow, Output Format, Pitfalls, Verification) with no nested reference chains; the inline output template is appropriately placed at one level. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |