Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized orchestration skill with concrete routing guidance and an explicit output contract. The main improvement would be de-duplicating the evidence-typing list and folding verification into inline workflow checkpoints.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 'sourced fact / user-provided evidence / inference / recommendation' taxonomy, which appears in Guardrails, step 4, and Output Format — define it once and reference it.
Move verification checks inline as checkpoints within the workflow steps (e.g., 'before recommending, confirm each claim is labeled by evidence type') rather than only as a trailing section.
Consider a one-line explicit note that the referenced sibling skills (exa-search, deep-research, etc.) are invoked by name rather than bundled, so Claude does not look for local reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, imperative, assumes Claude's competence, but the evidence-typing list (sourced fact / user-provided evidence / inference / recommendation) is restated across Guardrails, step 4, and Output Format and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing to named sub-skills with explicit escalation conditions and a copy-ready output template; minor gaps only because there are no literal commands (appropriate for an orchestration skill). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step numbered sequence plus a Verification section, but checkpoints live in a separate section rather than as inline validate-then-proceed feedback loops within the steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into distinct sections (Skill Stack, When to Use, Guardrails, Workflow, Output Format, Pitfalls, Verification); as a simple under-50-line skill with no bundle files needed, this structure earns full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |