swift-actor-persistence

Thread-safe data persistence in Swift using actors — in-memory cache with file-backed storage, eliminating data races by design.

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.kiro/skills/swift-actor-persistence/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with complete, executable Swift examples and strong structure, but it lacks validation/feedback checkpoints for its destructive file-write operations and carries minor conciseness redundancies.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/verification step after persistence (e.g. re-read and decode the file, or assert the written data round-trips) so the destructive write workflow has a feedback loop.

Have loadSynchronously surface or log decode failures instead of silently returning an empty dictionary, so data loss is detectable.

Merge the overlapping 'When to Activate' and 'When to Use' sections and trim the actor-model explainer to tighten conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean with complete code and tight tables, but includes minor over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows ("The actor model guarantees serialized access") and redundant 'When to Activate' / 'When to Use' sections.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Swift: a complete generic actor repository, usage examples, and an @Observable ViewModel integration covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The save/delete pattern is sequenced and uses .atomic writes, but file persistence is destructive and there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints (e.g. verify written data, surface decode failures rather than silently returning [:]), capping workflow clarity at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, and no bundle files are present; at ~135 lines it is slightly beyond the 'under 50 lines' simple-skill exception, leaving minor organization gaps.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, clearly conveying the Swift-actor persistence niche, but it lacks an explicit "Use when" trigger clause that would tell Claude when to activate the skill.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers (e.g. 'Use when building thread-safe local persistence in Swift, or when replacing DispatchQueue/lock-based synchronization with actors').

Add a natural synonym or two (e.g. 'concurrency', 'local storage') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Consider listing 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g. 'save, delete, and query Codable models') to round out capability specificity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete mechanisms — "in-memory cache with file-backed storage" and "eliminating data races by design" — but stops short of listing multiple discrete actions, leaving minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	The description gives a clear "what" but contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms a Swift developer would say ("thread-safe", "data persistence", "actors", "data races") with good coverage, though a few common synonyms (e.g. "concurrency", "local storage") are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a clear niche — Swift actor-based persistence — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk against generic storage or concurrency skills.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: .kiro/skills/swift-actor-persistence/SKILL.md
Commit: d8409a4

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.