swift-protocol-di-testing

Protocol-based dependency injection for testable Swift code — mock file system, network, and external APIs using focused protocols and Swift Testing.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.kiro/skills/swift-protocol-di-testing/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is actionable and well-sequenced with executable Swift examples and concise prose, scoring strongly on actionability and workflow clarity. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: everything is inlined in one file with no references to split the bulk of the code.

Suggestions

Move the larger code blocks (full default implementations, mock classes, test suite) into reference files under ./references/ and link to them from a leaner SKILL.md overview.

Define the types referenced in tests — MockFileSystemProvider and SyncManager.loadData — so the examples are fully self-contained and copy-paste runnable.

Add a brief 'verify' note (e.g. run the Swift Testing suite to confirm mocks behave) to give the pattern an explicit feedback checkpoint.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean code with brief, purposeful prose and does not over-explain Swift concepts Claude already knows; only minor sentences like 'Production code uses defaults; tests inject mocks.' could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable Swift code for protocols, default implementations, mocks, an actor, and Swift Testing cases, with minor gaps — tests reference MockFileSystemProvider and SyncManager.loadData that are not fully defined.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The Core Pattern is a clear numbered sequence (define protocols → default impls → mocks → inject → write tests); as a design-pattern skill it needs no validation checkpoint, though no explicit verification step is offered.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a monolithic ~186-line file with no bundle references; the volume of inline code blocks could be split into reference files for better progressive disclosure.	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and uses natural trigger terms for a clear Swift niche, but it lacks an explicit 'when to use' clause, which caps its completeness. Adding a 'Use when...' sentence would raise the completeness and distinctiveness scores.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when writing Swift code that touches the file system, network, or external APIs and needs deterministic, I/O-free tests.'

Add common synonyms users might say — 'stub', 'unit test', 'XCTest' — alongside 'mock' and 'Swift Testing' to broaden trigger coverage.

Tighten the action list to a comprehensive set (mock FS, network, iCloud, external APIs) so specificity reaches full coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions — 'mock file system, network, and external APIs using focused protocols and Swift Testing' — naming the domain plus multiple specific capabilities with only minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear (protocol-based DI for testable Swift code) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the guidelines completeness is capped at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms a Swift developer would say — 'dependency injection', 'mock', 'testable Swift code', 'Swift Testing', 'protocols' — with good coverage though missing synonyms like 'stub' or 'unit test'.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche — protocol-based DI for testable Swift code using Swift Testing — is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against a general Swift-testing skill.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: affaan-m/ECC
Path: .kiro/skills/swift-protocol-di-testing/SKILL.md
Commit: d8409a4

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.