Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit error-handling checkpoints. Its two weak spots are modest redundancy (the flat-layout domain rule stated twice) and a monolithic single-file layout that could move examples and layout specs into reference files.
Suggestions
State the flat-layout prefix rule once (in Configuration or Step 1) instead of duplicating it in Prerequisites and Step 1, and keep only one directory-tree example.
Move the full example dialog (~34 lines) into references/example-session.md and link to it, keeping a short two-line excerpt inline.
Consider extracting the domain-grouping algorithm details (prefix qualification, General fallback) into a reference file so the main body reads as a lean workflow overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the flat-layout prefix rule ('A prefix counts as a domain when 2+ files share it... splits at the first `-`') is stated twice — in Prerequisites and again nearly verbatim in Step 1 — and both directory trees plus a full example dialog could be trimmed. Minor over-explanation, matching the 4 anchor rather than the lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact command ('claude agents'), per-source parse rules, copy-paste user-facing prompts ('You selected N agents (max 5). Pick which to keep...'), and exact Agent tool parameters ('subagent_type: "general-purpose"', prompt template). Matches the copy-paste-ready 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops: zero-agents abort with a verbatim message, >5-agent narrowing prompt, per-agent failure handling with inline note and continuation, and single-agent synthesis skip. Checkpoints are explicit, exceeding the 4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clear headers and no nested references, but everything is inlined in a ~160-line file — the full example dialog and layout specifications are candidates for a references/ file. Good structure with minor organization gaps fits the 4 anchor; the 5 assumes content is appropriately split across files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |