Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable interactive workflow with concrete commands and tool parameters. Its main weakness is redundancy — the flat/subdirectory layout rules are defined in two places — which hurts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Define the flat vs. subdirectory layout rules once (in Prerequisites) and have Step 1 reference that definition instead of re-explaining the prefix algorithm.
Tighten the Examples section by trimming placeholder blocks like '[findings...]' or moving a fuller worked example into a reference file if the skill grows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the flat vs. subdirectory layout rules are explained twice (Prerequisites and Step 1) and could be tightened by referencing a single definition. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`claude agents`), exact Agent-tool parameters (subagent_type, prompt template), and menu/selection examples are provided; minor gaps remain in fuzzy-match specifics and the placeholder example outputs. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Discover, Present, Select, Spawn, Synthesize) includes checkpoints — no-agenes stop, >5 narrowing, and per-agent failure handling — though the batch operation's validation could be more explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (When to Use, Prerequisites, Configuration, How It Works, Rules, Examples) with no bundle files needed; at ~150 lines it is self-contained but the inlined discovery/layout detail and its duplication are minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |