CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

terminal-ops

Evidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified.

79

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured operator workflow that respects the context budget, gives concrete actionable guidance, sequences steps with validation checkpoints, and stays cleanly organized without nested references. Minor upside would be adding a concrete re-run validate-fix-retry command example, but nothing is broken or missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean terse bullet lists that assume Claude's competence; no padding explaining git, CI, or basic concepts, and every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and specific — exact status words, 'use the smallest useful proving command first', and a copy-ready output format block — so actionable despite no code examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced four-step workflow with explicit checkpoints (inspect before editing, re-run the proving command, stop broad retries on repeated failures) and a dedicated Verification section for destructive/push operations.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled pointers to sibling ECC skills; no nested reference chains and no bundle files to misorganize.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, concise description that states concrete capabilities, includes natural trigger terms, answers both what and when, and occupies a distinct niche. Third-person voice is correctly used with no over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' ('Evidence-first repo execution workflow') and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed' clause uses natural phrasings users would actually say, giving good coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (evidence-first terminal/repo execution for ECC) with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.