Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A focused, well-structured single-purpose skill with concrete naming rules and examples for both XML and code. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/verification checkpoint for the XML and source edits it prescribes.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after substitution (e.g. confirm referenced @dimen/R.dimen entries resolve or that the module still builds) to lift the workflow_clarity cap that applies to XML/batch edits.
Merge the '命名规则' and '从字面量到资源名的算法' sections — the truncation rule and the 12.5555 → dp_12_5 example are currently stated twice — to tighten conciseness.
Provide a brief fallback for the rare case where a dimen entry does not already exist (the skill assumes it does), so the agent has a checkpoint instead of silently emitting an unresolved reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude knows Android basics, but the truncation rule and 12.5555 → dp_12_5 example are restated across both '命名规则' and '从字面量到资源名的算法', a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an explicit naming algorithm, a worked example table, and concrete XML (@dimen/dp_12_5) and Kotlin/Java (R.dimen.dp_12_5) reference forms that are directly applicable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The transformation sequence is clear and edge cases are flagged in '注意', but for an XML/code-editing skill there is no explicit validation or verification step (e.g. confirm references resolve / build passes), which caps the score per the batch/XML-manipulation rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is organized into clearly labeled sections (何时用, 命名规则, 算法, XML/Kotlin 写法, 注意) that are easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |