Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with explicit validation checkpoints and clean navigation to backend-specific sibling skills. The main improvement opportunity is reducing cross-section repetition of the rearm and boundary guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the COMPUTER_USE_REARM_REQUIRED handling into one section and reference it elsewhere, rather than restating the /computer-use on instructions in multiple places.
Tighten the Operating Rules list by merging near-duplicate items (e.g. the several 'confirm only from the latest screenshot' rules) to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no basic explanations of screenshots or desktops), but the rearm guidance and the linux-desktop/Docker boundary are restated across multiple sections, and the Operating Rules list is long with some repetition that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete JSON tool contract, exact argument signatures, the full action enum, and precise behavioral rules (dispatch values, normalized coords, focus_verified=true, fail-closed on unverifiable targets) that are directly executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered Core Loop is sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — rearm fail-closed, screenshot-before-claiming-success, and fail-closed keyboard targeting — giving strong feedback loops for state-changing operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained body with well-organized sections and one-level-deep pointers to sibling backend skills (host-computer-use-linux/macos/windows); no bundle files are present, and the single-file structure is clear and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |